Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A VerySpatial Podcast

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Shimeru (talk) 20:56, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A VerySpatial Podcast[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Non-notable podcast where prod was removed by the author. A Google search turned up no reliable 3rd party sources. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 20:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)~~ I hereby redact my nomination for deletion due to Morenooso's comment and the addition of a verifiable source that says that this podcast is receiving an award. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 22:33, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm happy to keep this, if sources showing it to be notable are found. It's a good podcast, and interesting - but I can't show it to be notable. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 14:40, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Updated the page with reliable external references. ESRI (blog reference) is the industry leader in GIS desktop and server tools. Directions Magazine is an active GIS industry web magazine. Will try to dig up number of listeners per week. Considering the number of 30-50 minute long podcasts (not counting 50 special episodes) will reach 250 in May - that in itself is quite notable. Ragnvald (talk) 16:10, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:25, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. —Morenooso (talk) 22:09, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - The WP:N requirement is for "significant coverage in reliable independent sources", plural, and having reviewed the sources added to the article by Ragnvald, the only one that is both reliable and independent within the meaning of WP:N is this one. Delete as non-notable unless further significant coverage in reliable independent sources is found. - DustFormsWords (talk) 04:11, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per WP:WEB's second criteria, "The website or content has won a well-known and independent award from either a publication or organization." ESRI is a well known GIS software company. The first reference in the article comes from ESRI's site (VerySpatial, LLC, Earns Top Honors for Innovative Use of GIS Technology events.esri.com Retrieved: 2010-04-08 which reads, "VerySpatial, LLC, stood out from more than 300,000 organizations worldwide . . . ESRI will present the organization with a Special Achievement in GIS (SAG) Award at the 27th Annual ESRI International User Conference in San Diego, California, June 20." --Morenooso (talk) 21:52, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.