Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Taste of Cockroach
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Allan Baillie. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 21:12, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A Taste of Cockroach[edit]
- A Taste of Cockroach (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It's unlikely that this book satisfies WP:BKCRIT. I found nothing in the Google News archive; and a general search returned only the expected listings on the publisher's web site, Amazon, abebooks, etc. The author himself seems to be notable, but not so notable that criterion #5 applies. Alexrexpvt (talk) 05:36, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Allan Baillie. The author seems to be notable but I can't find anything to suggest that this book is notable outside of one mention in a book, which I added to the article. A redirect would probably be best in this instance.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:16, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 17:35, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 17:35, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect. Its not notable. - Shiftchange (talk) 13:16, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Allan Baillie until third party sources appear. Leave history intact as non-offensive and of possible value to merge. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:19, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.