Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Strange Arrangement
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Mayer Hawthorne. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:46, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- A Strange Arrangement (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Completing nomination for 98.248.33.198 (talk · contribs), reason provided was:
| “ | Prod removed by creator without addressing the concerns. Fails to meet the criteria for music albums. At best, could be merged into Mayer Hawthorne. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 19:58, 3 October 2009 (UTC) | ” |
Pointless. Delete. 76.173.74.250 (talk) 23:09, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Why is this pointless? Its someones album that they released with references. I don't understand how you can call your actions on Wikipedia un-bias. All you are doing is deleting work that is obviously important (and this has a point) to somebody. You are not the only person browsing Wikipedia. I'm sure the article will not get in your precious way. I don't understand you people. Don't you have anything better to do than exercise your tiny ounce of power that Wikipedia gives to ALL users by being an asshole? Independent Music Source (talk) 22:24, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 04:41, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted by JForget (talk · contribs) at 23:09, 9 October 2009 (UTC), who for some reason did not use the standard relisting template. Tim Song (talk) 04:41, 10 October 2009 (UTC) [reply]
- As much as I tend to react to people being insulting and not understanding how the actual notability process on Wikipedia works by being more inclined to delete, this album has charted, and has been up to number 2 on the Billboard Heatseekers chart, while also breaking into the R&B and Billboard 200 charts as well. It's not *huge*, but it's charted, so may be notable. Weak keep and I'm going to leave a nice note for the above editor. Tony Fox (arf!) 04:27, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Mayer Hawthorne as suggested on article talk page Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 08:28, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete (or merge) While the editor Independent Music Source is not helping his case, the reason I am supporting the deletion is based solely on the lack of notability of the album. Nezzadar (speak) 22:58, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.