Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Nightmare on Elm Street (disambiguation)

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2013 October 15.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:07, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A Nightmare on Elm Street (disambiguation)[edit]

Completely unnecessary and virtually useless disambiguous page. Every Nightmare article has a template (Template:Nightmareseries) that links every single Nightmare related page. We also have A Nightmare on Elm Street (franchise), which is linked in the first sentence of each of the film pages. Having a disambiguous page that does nothing but link film pages that are already linked like that twice is unnecessary. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 11:56, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Anything of this nature can be cleared up with the Template:otheruse.Afkatk (talk) 12:42, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A dab page is used for navigating articles with the same or similar titles, not for listing films within a single series. The articles concerned already have sufficient linkage to each other. PC78 (talk) 15:18, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 15:27, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Despite saving this from speedy (as someone other than the page creator had contested it) I can't see the point of this page as the franchise page does the job just as well - that's not to mention the Template. Dpmuk (talk) 15:28, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Redundant dab. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 16:18, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete pointless dismabig for a single film franchise - hence its having a franchise article. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 16:20, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.