Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Loud Call

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Rewrite of the article is strongly recommended per the comments below. Kurykh (talk) 05:23, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Loud Call[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article should be deleted as it fails WP:GNG by not having "significant coverage in reliable sources". A WP:BEFORE search did not provide any references either. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions}) 14:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:07, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 01:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep (but rewrite about album): The main problem is this article is specifically about a 5-track EP, which was in fact a subset of songs from a more notable LP album of the same name. A Loud Call (the full album) was nominated for an ARIA award, was album of the week on ABC Radio National, and the Holly Throsby article has text and several references about it which could be transferred to an article about the album, and which could mention the EP release. --Canley (talk) 01:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and rewrite - in support of Canley's analysis. I have not done my own analysis. Aoziwe (talk) 12:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and rewrite per Canley. Additionally the full album peaked at No. 34 on the ARIA Charts. (see here). Neither her official website 1 nor her label's site 2 list an EP of that same name. The AllMusic review is of the full album. I would hesitate to mention this EP's release in the expanded article without any reliable source.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 19:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and rewrite as per previous comments. Dan arndt (talk) 09:30, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per nom.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:20, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.