Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Kiss Could Be Deadly
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete for failing to meet WP:MUSIC. Kusma (討論) 02:10, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Couldn't establish notability per WP:MUSIC Nv8200p talk 23:48, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep 2 EPs so far, West Coast tour, points listed under "trivia". TruthbringerToronto 02:36, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Absolutely none of those things help meet WP:MUSIC. Not even a bit. The 2 EPs were released by non-notable labels; WP:MUSIC mentions "national" tours, not coastal tours; and trivia points mean less than nothing. I could create an article on a band and then create a trivia section that says, "They enjoy eating grilled cheese sandwiches." Would that establish notability? -- Kicking222 02:52, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete - Self released albums, shows only in California and Arizona (according to myspace), and according to WP:MUSIC, radio play needs to be on a major radio network. --Joelmills 02:51, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete Little assertion of notability, and what is asserted still is not notable. They fail WP:MUSIC on every count. They don't have any well-known members, and they're on a record label that, by WP standards, is insignificant. The article is also completely unsourced, so any claims of notability fail WP:V. Hell, the band uses MySpace as its official web site. -- Kicking222 02:52, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Needs more verifiable sources cited, needs cleanup, but does (in my opinion, contrary to Kicking222's opinion) make good claims for notability. Parsssseltongue 19:05, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:MUSIC Jaranda wat's sup 20:32, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- National tour, a record release, radioplay, coverage on several notable websites (examples: Alternative Tentacles, Warped Tour)... how does it fail? Parsssseltongue 22:27, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I still can't find evidence of a national tour according to their website, they don't have a record label, and radioplay is not on a national level. The mention on Alternative Tentacles is a passing reference to their appearance at a show with one of AT's bands. The mention on Warped tour's website is in the forums, listed as a favorite band of someone posting on the forum. However, Punknews.org (see Punknews Records) has a nice profile on them [1]. I still don't think this lets them pass WP:MUSIC. --Joelmills 04:08, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redemption Records. And the things you pointed out, I feel, ARE enough to make them notable. If I were a more experienced Wiki user, I'd propose a policy on revamping the music criteria since there's been so much dispute. Maybe some day... :) Parsssseltongue 04:32, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I still can't find evidence of a national tour according to their website, they don't have a record label, and radioplay is not on a national level. The mention on Alternative Tentacles is a passing reference to their appearance at a show with one of AT's bands. The mention on Warped tour's website is in the forums, listed as a favorite band of someone posting on the forum. However, Punknews.org (see Punknews Records) has a nice profile on them [1]. I still don't think this lets them pass WP:MUSIC. --Joelmills 04:08, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- National tour, a record release, radioplay, coverage on several notable websites (examples: Alternative Tentacles, Warped Tour)... how does it fail? Parsssseltongue 22:27, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Jaranda. Non-notable. Ral315 (talk) 14:20, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable band. --Musicpvm 05:13, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.