Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Keyword Driven Approach to Software Test Automation
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Peacent 02:32, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- A Keyword Driven Approach to Software Test Automation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Contested prod of unencyclopedic how-to guide/essay Katr67 18:36, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Yet another test framework. Essay, ad, likely a copy-pasta from somewhere, notability not established, technical text not suitable for encyclopedia etc. Pavel Vozenilek 18:48, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I tried to find evidence of copyvio using Google, but nothing turned up. Katr67 18:54, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. - Blantant Advertising.--Edtropolis 20:34, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. - I can barely understand this mess, much less determine how to clean it up. Furthermore, it's not notable. 128.158.145.51 21:56, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I looked at the title and thought, "oy." Delete per above comments. Non-notable technical...Someguy1221 22:34, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Long essay-like unencyclopedic mess whose only source seems to be a single section of a web page. —David Eppstein 00:03, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete is the keyword. -- Rob C (Alarob) 02:05, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I tagged this article for deltetion about 2 months ago. The creator removed the tag but it seems they made no effort to improve the article.--Greatestrowerever 16:02, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete article does not belong in an encyclopaedia. Capmango 17:37, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as an essay -- Whpq 19:14, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.