Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Fantástica Fábrica de Cadáver

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 22:42, 24 August 2015 (UTC) P.S. Since the article had been created and deleted three times in recent months, I salted the title as well. --MelanieN (talk) 22:45, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Fantástica Fábrica de Cadáver[edit]

A Fantástica Fábrica de Cadáver (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:A9 was declined. Musician has no article, is a redirect to the band of which he is/was a member. Additionally it fails WP:NALBUM. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eduardo (rapper). ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 03:23, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:56, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:56, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | Talk 16:57, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I suppose as the artist's article has been redirected to the group's and my searches found nothing to suggest independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:34, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 13:25, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I was unable to find adequate coverage of the album in reliable sources. Jujutacular (talk) 17:16, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.