Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Don

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:50, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Don

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable rural village in Laos. There are zero sources other than a map that purports to pinpoint its location. This article could / should be a redirect to Sekong Province if not removed altogether. Michepman (talk) 21:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Michepman (talk) 21:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Michepman (talk) 21:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Laos-related deletion discussions. Michepman (talk) 21:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islands-related deletion discussions. Michepman (talk) 21:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find any kind of settlement on the coordinates referenced in the article. [1] Oakshade (talk) 03:37, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - It may be that Google's map data is incomplete, or this is another poorly executed hoax. Michepman (talk) 03:44, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair, there are only two decimal degrees of precision, so the village, if it exists, could be up to 1km from the listed coordinates. There is an unmarked village at 15.9143707N, 106.9519673E. And the "A" prefix is very common for villages in this part of Laos. It's listed [2] here, so unlikely to be a hoax. It's also exceptionally hard to search for. I'm officially neutral on deletion. SportingFlyer T·C 10:44, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

'Delete per WP:V. It's no sin not to list every possible village. When sources exist, then we can list it. Quality over quantity. Bearian (talk) 00:59, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails any possible SNG and GNG. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 05:26, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.