Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AZURA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted (G11) by OlEnglish. Non-admin closure. Deor (talk) 14:26, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AZURA

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable property development Travelbird (talk) 09:30, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as it fails the general notability guideline. By the way, why did you turn my PROD into an AfD? Feezo (Talk) 09:32, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Sorry, there must have been an edit conflict. I didn't realize that the page had been proded. Travelbird (talk) 09:34, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Not a problem, don't worry about it. :) Feezo (Talk) 09:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Completely non-notable company. Little more than WP:SPAM. Qworty (talk) 09:37, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, could even qualify as a WP:CSD#G11 as this is pretty much just advertising for the place. --Kinu ^t/_c 11:19, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged as obvious speedy delete EEng (talk) 01:22, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.