Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AVRillo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:24, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AVRillo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Claims awards; so A7 may not be applicable. I can't find any reliable sources. —teb728 t c 06:19, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Completely unsourced and poorly formatted. I couldn't find a single reliable source. May violate Wikipedia:OR (May also be self-published)?—gargleafg (talk) 06:50, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as promotional bs. –Davey2010 • (talk) 22:21, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An unreferenced article from a WP:SPA. No evidence found that this firm is of encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 07:23, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.