Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ATAT Tech

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:11, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ATAT Tech

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails :WP:CORP and WP:SIGCOV .The company was founded in 2016 clearly upcoming a case of WP:TOOSOON as well .Lacks substantial coverage in reliable sources. Written by an apparently undeclared paid editor Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:37, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:02, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:03, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable, as there is not enough independent, reliable sources that support the material in the article. Also, the article was created by a paid editor, which indicates the possibility for abuse that we have not spotted. For these reasons, this article should be deleted. RileyBugz ^会話 _投稿記録 02:54, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing in the WP:VG/RS custom search engine, leading me to believe this company is not notable. Clear delete. --Izno (talk) 13:17, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.