Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ASEAN Centre for Energy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The issues leading to the delete arguments have been addressed and remaining consensus is that the content should be kept. Whether it's a standalone article or merged with ASEAN is an issue that can be handled editorially and does not need further extension of this AfD. Star Mississippi 17:00, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ASEAN Centre for Energy[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NPOV and WP:COPYVIO issues. Draft:ASEAN Centre for Energy exist; This page may be a "copy and paste" move. RPSkokie (talk) 04:40, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:57, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:57, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per WP:G11 as unambigious promotionalism. Devonian Wombat (talk) 06:14, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Its a bona fide an intergovernmental organisation and there is plenty of coverage of it, though the article needs a lot of work.Rathfelder (talk) 11:11, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Copyright violations make up the entirety of the promotional article. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 05:05, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Apparently the copyvios have been deleted. Reliable sources include Bangkok Post. Chidgk1 (talk) 12:55, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Copyvios have been removed but article still needs consideration.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 02:14, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Needs a lot of work but appears to a legit government organization that has press coverage.Super (talk) 03:20, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge selectively to ASEAN. The article does not appear to have enough coverage to merit the requirements of WP:NCORP to sustain its own stand alone page. Graywalls (talk) 07:02, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as it has enough coverage for notability.Jackattack1597 (talk) 20:16, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.