Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ASD Cape Town

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:23, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ASD Cape Town

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I PRODded this article; the creator raised an objection on my talk page - see this and this so I'm bringing it here instead. This is a football academy that has produced a handful of professional players, but there is no evidence that it is itself notable - it has not received significant, third-party coverage. Giant Snowman 09:27, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:30, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep I think this article could pass WP:GNG if done right, just a quick few results on google gave me. What I find interesting is [1] it could bring the first Indian player to the Premiership, but that can't be sure. When they are also playing exibition matches against teams like Deportivo I can see it pass GNG. Govvy (talk) 12:03, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 19:08, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 19:08, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 06:03, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme (talk) 20:56, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no indication of notability; playing an exhibition match is not a sign of meeting GNG. C 679 23:31, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TBrandley ^{(what's up)} 02:34, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.