Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AS/NZS 3760
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 05:42, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
AS/NZS 3760[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- AS/NZS 3760 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AS3959, notability not established with substantive independent sources Reywas92Talk 20:55, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:58, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:58, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:13, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: per WP:GNG and WP:KITCHENSINK. TarnishedPathtalk 09:06, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft-deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 20:56, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:18, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.