Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ARDOR (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 20:01, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ARDOR

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not an expert on cryptocurrencies, but this seems to be lacking sufficient coverage in crypto-compliant, reliable sources. b uidhe 16:35, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 03:39, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 03:39, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 03:39, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 03:41, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Unsourced, mostly ruined by copyvio cleanup. Even before that the sources were questionable. N0nsensical.system^(err0r?)_(.log) 09:09, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - zero RS coverage that I can find. Even the crypto blog coverage is promotional. Given it was deleted in the previous discussion, probably needs salting against further promotional recreation - David Gerard (talk) 10:04, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Ardor was ranked as a top 10 performing digital asset in 2017 by the World Economic Forum. Well, no. The WEF document quotes another source (and links to https://coinmarketcap.com/assets). These days, ARDOR isn't even listed anymore. Vexations (talk) 14:58, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Same reasons already given.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.