Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/APT assault rifle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Project Abakan. There is no such thing as delete and merge, since it destroys the history, and would violate the licence in respect to attribution Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 00:58, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
APT assault rifle[edit]
- APT assault rifle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability, appears to fail WP:GNG. Cut and paste move from Postnikov assault rifle. CharlieEchoTango (contact) 03:59, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:33, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:33, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:33, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm inclined torwards Keep if better sourcing can be found - as a weapon developed for military use, notability is close to inherent...if it can be verified reliably. - The Bushranger One ping only 17:08, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and merge anything useful to Project Abakan. I can't find it in Jane's, although my copies are old-ish. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:18, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:47, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and merge per AndyDingley. Buckshot06 (talk) 02:38, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.