Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/APPSeCONNECT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:03, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

APPSeCONNECT

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Press releases and routine awards do not amount to notability per WP:NCORP Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:40, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:13, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:13, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:13, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NCORP. You can tell they're scraping the bottom of the barrel when the fact it complies with the law is cited as a reference. Cabayi (talk) 18:28, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Galobtter Cabayi I have removed the Press Releases which i found earlier when i was searching about the product. Please let me know if there are any other changes required! Anmolgupta.95 (talk) 10:47, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The article needs "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic." to be kept. See WP:N. Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:39, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete promotional article, fails WP:NCORP. Bharatiya 29 13:30, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Galobtter Cabayi I have found and added new reliable sources which are independent of the topic. Anmolgupta.95 (talk) 13:56, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:56, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:24, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: ~~(or Incubate):~~ Too much focus on the corporation rather than the product and the hype may be clouding anything good and I'm not sure fixable, may be WP:TOOSOON. Might be tempted to change my mind if more in depth about how APPSeCONNECT works rather than connecting a load of high level buzzwords together. Possibly no obvious vulnerability handling which may be a concern but not a concern from an article viewpoint. No obvious 100% independent review found, perhaps Business Software is one of the nearest but I have qualms about verification and independence of reviews. The Nascomm award is possibly borderline notable.Djm-leighpark (talk) 10:55, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Djm-leighpark I am sorry for the late reply. I have founded and added new information about APPSeCONNECT with reliable sources. I also checked out Business Software. Please let me know if any other changes are required. If i get more infoirmation i will add it to this!Anmolgupta.95 (talk) 06:21, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Comment If all else fails I suggesting responding to the COI notices on your talk page. I also have placed a COI editnotice notice on the article edit page as I believe I have reasonable cause for so doing. Simply ignoring those is not helpful in my opinion. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 07:49, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.