Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ANTLE

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Rolls-Royce Trent. Sandstein 08:11, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANTLE

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Totally unsourced even after 13 years, no apparent notability. Sourced content could be covered elsewhere. BilCat (talk) 03:20, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, for not being verifiable.Dannyniu (talk) 03:29, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:50, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Move content to Rolls-Royce Trent, its only link in the main space. Seems not unsourced but badly referenced.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 05:07, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Sources and references have been added since my nomination. Agree with merge with Trent article. - BilCat (talk) 05:12, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.