Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AN/TAS-4

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of military electronics of the United States. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:17, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AN/TAS-4

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references, notability not established for over 5 years. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 15:56, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to List of military electronics of the United States, an appropriate location for a brief description. It could be argued that the AN/ designation is prima facie evidence of notability, but (barring sufficient sources for an expansion) an inclusive list of these types would be better than a series of stubs in this instance. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:45, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:00, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirecta one sentence summary to List of military electronics of the United States, per The Bushranger. This is verifiable and per WP:PRESERVE, merging of verifiable content is preferable to deletion. AN/TAS-4 already has an entry in List of military electronics of the United States, so it is a natural merge target. --Mark viking (talk) 22:03, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I may be flirting with WP:AGF here but I don't see indication that nominator considered alternatives to deletion. ~KvnG 00:12, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect per others above. Buckshot06 (talk) 06:23, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question - If the outcome is merge and redirect, who is going to do to merge work? ~KvnG 17:50, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.