Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AMT Games

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Not (substantially) contested; the one comment by a WP:COI editor does not satisfactorily address the problems identified in the nomination.  Sandstein  09:12, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

AMT Games

AMT Games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Topic lack significant coverage from reliable secondary source. Also a WP:PROMO article written by the company's head of marketing. The1337gamer (talk) 14:50, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 14:51, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 14:51, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

From author

Hey, just want to comment on adding my article to the list for deletion. I'm aware of the COI, and I tried to only add data available publicly without any promotion materials, there are only facts in this article, all games developed by the company can be found in the appstore and play market. Please consider to keep the article, it was actually created to give more information about the developer for the users who read about it's main project - battle for the galaxy, as there was a red link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sam Tyurenkov (talk • contribs) 12:16, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:50, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:09, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.