Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ALAK (airline)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:33, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ALAK (airline)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yes, this article indeed survives in this abysmal shape since 2006. I cannot find anything that would establish notability per WP:CORP, no coverage at all. --FoxyOrange (talk) 13:32, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-scheduled minor charter carrier out of Moscow in the '90s, with almost no mention in any extant sources. The closest to "coverage" that I can find is mention of a partnership with also-defunct Air Saravi to operate a Tupolev Tu-134 in Slovakia. But that's not notability, at all. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 19:35, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steven Zhang ^{Help resolve disputes!} 10:48, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per above. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 15:55, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

!? So far, nobody has voiced any arguments for the article to be kept.--FoxyOrange (talk) 16:38, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.