Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ACT Hybrid Vehicle Authority

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:55, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ACT Hybrid Vehicle Authority[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems to be a hoax. The on-line references are all dead-links, and searches find only WP mirrors. That's negative evidence, but the Australian Capital Territory's Department of Territory and Municipal Services website does have a section on Sustainable Transport, which would surely mention this Authority if it existed. The author Ardornofan (talk · contribs) edited only on a single day three years ago, and his only other contribution Ambrose Park, New South Wales is also a suspected hoax (see AfD below). Congratulations to Grogan deYobbo (talk), who tagged them both. At best, this fails WP:V. JohnCD (talk) 16:58, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —JohnCD (talk) 17:02, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:02, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I come from Canberra and it looks like a joke, but obviously by sombody very familar with Canberra politics.--Grahame (talk) 00:32, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete almost certain to be a hoax Nick-D (talk) 06:57, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: if not a hoax then obviously completely non-notable. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 18:33, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete if sources can't even verify its existence, won't pass any notability mark. LibStar (talk) 07:33, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete either non-notable or hoax. bobrayner (talk) 23:39, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.