Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AB md. 1941

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  18:48, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AB md. 1941[edit]

AB md. 1941 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about non notable automobile used in World War. No citations provided as well. NepaliKeto62Talk to me 03:44, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:49, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:49, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:49, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:50, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The AFD nomination gives it too much implication of notability, by saying it was "used in World War." since per the article it was not in use in a war:per the article "The AB md. 1941 would've been an Romanian armoured car..." Unless this concept car got the required coverage for notability the article should be deleted. Edison (talk) 13:58, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:11, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- the article states that the subject "would've been an Romanian armoured car". Nothing notable about this "would have been" vehicle. It appears it was never produced. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:33, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.