Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ABBYY Business Card Reader

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to ABBYY. J04n(talk page) 13:15, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ABBYY Business Card Reader[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

cant establish notability, number of links to people/companies selling the product overwhelms my ability to find RS. UseTheCommandLine (talk) 06:31, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge – The company ABBYY is notable per Wikipedia's criteria, so I suggest merging a summary onto that article.[1] Praemonitus (talk) 17:48, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TBrandley ^{(what's up)} 00:26, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep-The article refers to an existing software of a famous and leading company. The topic is notable.--Goldenaster (talk) 13:38, 25 February 2013 (UTC) — Goldenaster (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete It's trivial. At best should be a redirect. {{user|Goldenaster has made 12 edits, 10 of them !Keeps on AfDs. Dougweller (talk) 15:58, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I'm a new user... I thought I could express my opinion here. If I am in breach of any rule of WP you can certainly delete my comments in this talk! Thanks--Goldenaster (talk) 12:05, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not many new users manage to find their way immediately to AfDs, let alone consistently !vote Keep. Dougweller (talk) 13:01, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was reading Finnish exonyms for places in Norway. At the beginning of the article was written "Please share your thoughts on the matter" followed from this link Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finnish exonyms for places in Norway. I expressed my opinion and I've seen that at the top of page there was this link Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. On this list I have chosen, between different articles, the ones that interested me, and I expressed my opinion on some of them (four or five if I remember correctly). This on ABBYY was one of the ones. Sorry but I didn't know I couldn't do it.--Goldenaster (talk) 13:58, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I hadn't thought of that explanation. You can !vote, but have you read WP:NOTABILITY and the associated pages that refer to particular types of articles? Your reasons for !voting should relate to our criteria for notability, otherwise they should be ignored. Dougweller (talk) 16:30, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per Praemonitus. Company is notable, product is not. Storkk (talk) 10:25, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect - as above. Neutrality^talk 11:55, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - to ABBYY article, which already has a products section. As above, company is notable, product's notability is not sufficient for separate article. Dialectric (talk) 12:01, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as per above. a13ean (talk) 17:00, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.