Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.S.D. Villabiagio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🎉 _{(HAPPY 2023)} 13:45, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A.S.D. Villabiagio[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable disestablished amateur football club, no longer active since 2018. [1]. A Google search only returns trivial statistical references, and no notable WP:RS coverage. [2] Angelo (talk) 10:25, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Angelo (talk) 10:25, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:38, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:25, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Serie D, possisble search term. Giant Snowman 13:30, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Club won the Coppa Italia Dilettanti in 2017, which was covered in multiple Italian-language sources [3][4][5]. Moreover, non-routine coverage of its demise can be found here [6]. Certainly, the article needs to be fleshed out, but I believe that the sources I have given demonstrate notability. YoungIreland (talk) 20:30, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Having won an amateur cup exclusively meant to Eccellenza and Promozione teams, which happens to be a tournament with very little national coverage (the one articles you referenced are from local Web media), is not enough to give notability to the subject. The last article you mentioned is merely an interview to the club owner just before of the club demise, which does not qualify as WP:RS. In fact, there is no real secondary worthwhile coverage about the club, apart from the usual football article reports you can easily find for any amateur team in Italy. The fact the team has not even been re-established for five seasons, which is very common practice in Italian football, is also quite telling. Angelo (talk) 21:24, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Per YoungIreland. Article needs improvement, not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 00:29, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 13:34, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep passes GNG with above references.--Ortizesp (talk) 20:30, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per YoungIreland.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:35, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.