Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.G

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Strength of argument prevailed. —Ganesha811 (talk) 04:20, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A.G[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotion of non-notable company. Note previous deletion and salting of articles about company president and Hakawi News, which he also runs. No articles in ar-wiki about any of these entities. HouseOfChange (talk) 03:34, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. HouseOfChange (talk) 03:34, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Technology. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good article, and after reviewing several sources, the discussion was closed and removed from deletion and installed in the public domain. GQO (talk) 6:50, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete - Per nom. The appropriate guidelines are WP:NCORP and there are no sources that I can find that meet NCORP standards. The sourcing on the page is a terrible mess. Fully half of the sources claim to be an Arabic news site, but come up as "account suspended" so I strongly doubt the reliability of those, and they are unverifiable. In any case they would almost certainly be primary sources, as are all the remainder. This is a newly created page, but it is certainly not ready for mainspace. It was draftified once, but the creator promptly moved it back out of draftspace. I doubt an encyclopaedic page is possible at this time, and in view of the summary move out of draftspace, and previous deletion, I would say this should be deleted. The above !vote from a new user suggests they reviewed the sources, but perhaps they are unaware of the guidelines at WP:SIRS as to what is required of a source for NCORP pages. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 14:42, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Request a review, I added some evidence and secondary sources

(Ahmed brens (talk) 22:09, 5 April 2024 (UTC))[reply]

I am still seeing the same issues, including links that won't load. Which of these sources are secondary? Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 22:19, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.