Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aéroport-Trudeau (Montreal Metro)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ѕandahl 03:18, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aéroport-Trudeau (Montreal Metro)

Plan for possible future expansion - virtually nothing in google in either french or english. No timeline as to when this may or may not happen or even whether it's reached that point. At the very least, it could be condensed down into a line and merge into Montreal Metro which doesn't even cover this. Travellingcari (talk) 20:12, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. —Travellingcari (talk) 20:14, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is there a proposed map? Have the papers been talking about the route? Has anyone discussed how much it will cost? DGG (talk) 03:20, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply nothing that I've been able to find in either language. This is all I find (I know, not independent -- but it shows how little it's even been discussed by the metro). Half the google results are the circle of Montreal Metro wikis -- circular discussion of the line. Only thing verifiable is that it was talked about once. See here especially, which is a search on the route that was discussed. There's nothing concrete, WP:RS or not. Travellingcari (talk) 04:32, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I remember there were politicos speaking about the final destination being as Dorval Airport... but I don't remember any plans extending further than Montreal West commuter train station. 132.205.44.5 (talk) 20:44, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- comment and noise:signal ratio is high with blog chatter, but there's some minor discussion. Nothing substantive which is what prompted my AfD nomination. Travellingcari (talk) 21:09, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 10:09, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete based on the answers to my questions.DGG (talk) 19:40, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It would be perfectly valid to discuss an expansion proposal like this in the parent article Montreal Metro. But a proposed station really shouldn't have its own article until at the bare minimum it's moved from "proposed" to "approved and actively in development". Delete. Bearcat (talk) 19:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per WP:CRYSTAL and a lack of any verifiable sourcing. I should also point out that this, in effect, recreating the article Montreal's international airport high-speed access which was successfully prodded (by me) back in the fall. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:32, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.