Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/9News Nigeria
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:28, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 9News Nigeria (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:ORGCRIT or WP:GNG. This is actually a disputed AfC submission which has been declined several times at Draft:9News Nigeria. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Organizations, and Nigeria. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. We shouldn't support work arounds of the draft process, but even if that weren't the case, this doesn't pass WP:ORG.4meter4 (talk) 01:23, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Ampil (Ταικ • Cοnτribυτιοns) 07:18, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: The sources does not meet the criteria for organisations. Sources available are routine coverages which are not significant. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 15:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete After WP:BEFORE and indepth digging, unfortunately this media house does not have any reason to stand. They fail notability guidelines per WP:GNG Tesleemah (talk) 12:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.