Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/925five Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:37, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

925five Records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article for a non-notable record company. Contested speedy. --Finngall ^talk 17:31, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable independent label. Appears to be mainly promotional and the user that contested the speedy is working on other articles for artists by this label. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:22, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:28, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:28, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:28, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Looking through the related articles too - David Gerard (talk) 18:00, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as newly started company with nothing coming close at all for substance. SwisterTwister talk 22:45, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.