Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/91X Top 91 of 2004

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:07, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

91X Top 91 of 2004

This is certainly verifiable, but it's just listcruft. Do we care what the top N songs of YYYY were as declared by some radio station? Not I, said the fly. howch e ng {chat} 01:00, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Someone apparently went around cut and pasting a lot of these, starting from 91X Top 91 of 1983 up until 91X Top 91 of 2005. At least some of them are recreations of deleted content (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/91X Top 91 of 1983) and at least one is currently listed on afd (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/91X Top 91 of 1995). I say delete them all. - Bobet 01:31, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: The creator of the lists said to delete them all in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/91X Top 91 of 1995 (comment by Tom on 18:29, 2 January 2006 (UTC)). Shouldn't that qualify them for speedy deletion? - Bobet 01:35, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Not sure if that qualifies them for speedy deletion, but I think they should all be deleted anyway. Evil Eye 02:24, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Pepsidrinka 05:07, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the lot of them. Scoo 08:47, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom. Obina 11:12, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. Unecyclopedic and nn listcruft. WP:NOT an indiscriminate collection of information. Zunaid 11:20, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete listcruft, plain and simple. Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 12:04, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per AfD on '95 article. XETRA-FM is probably a notable enough station, just by virtue of being a Mexican-licensed station with a primarily US audience, but I don't think they're that influential that their listcruft belongs on WP. Haikupoet 19:47, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not some place to list the hits of the year. --Terence Ong ^Talk 15:00, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.