Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/91X Top 91 of 1996

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was overwhelmingly to remove all of these lists.--File Éireann 18:43, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

91X Top 91 of 1984, 91X Top 91 of 1985, 91X Top 91 of 1986, 91X Top 91 of 1987, 91X Top 91 of 1988, 91X Top 91 of 1989, 91X Top 91 of 1990, 91X Top 91 of 1991, 91X Top 91 of 1992, 91X Top 91 of 1993, 91X Top 91 of 1994, 91X Top 91 of 1996, 91X Top 91 of 1997, 91X Top 91 of 1998, 91X Top 91 of 1999, 91X Top 91 of 2000, 91X Top 91 of 2001, 91X Top 91 of 2002, 91X Top 91 of 2003, 91X Top 91 of 2005[edit]

We've been through these before EOY lists before. Non notable. We cannot have year end countdowns from all local radio stations. With the thousands of stations in the world and the lack of methodology usually used for these things, it's unencyclopedic as well. Kill all 3 of these lists. Woohookitty^{(cat scratches)} 12:25, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I added the rest of them that weren't deleted or on afd already. - Bobet 12:50, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
And delete all. - Bobet 12:50, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. Raw data, no information, let alone any that belongs on an encyclopedia, violating WP:NOT indiscriminate collection of information. And yes I checked all of them. --Last Malthusian 13:23, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. 91X is not an internationally reknowned music station, and San Diego isn't exactly a world famous centre of music talent, therefore this station's opinion isn't famous or influential enough to count as encyclopedic. Average Earthman 13:35, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. Potentially huge number of lists of no use at all. --Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 16:17, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all of these xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 18:22, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per above arguments. Punkmorten 18:23, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.