Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/66 & Nowhere

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I'm afraid that awards at a non-notable film festival indeed do not make for a notable film. I could create a film, and then create a non-notable film festival, and award my film "best film ever in the universe for all eternity", but my film would be non-notable. This is theoretical only, it is not a comment on the quality of the film or the film festival. Since the film festival giving the award has not been shown to be notable, by strength of argument consensus is to delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:40, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

66 & Nowhere

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film written by PAID COI. Lacks in-depth, non-trivial support. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. Has won one an award, but does not appear to be significant enough to support inclusion into Wikipedia. reddogsix (talk) 18:01, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:53, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Per WP:NOTFILM, the film is notable because has won two awards, was featured at an international film festival, and is available for mass consumption via Amazon's Prime Video. Also the film is listed on the Internet Movie Database and the San Diego Reader and San Diego City Beat have both written about the film and its releases. All of this is cited in the article. Sandiegoadam (talk) 16:25, 1 August 2018 (

Comment - the awards are not notable awards. IMDB is not a valid reference. The "consumption" and references fail WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 16:33, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - the fact that it was screened at a film festival makes it notable. And per WP:NOTFILM, "Standards have not yet been established to define a major award", so the argument that either award that it has won is not notable does not seem to be supported by WP:NOTFILM. Sandiegoadam (talk) 18:00, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment - Let see what the Wikipedia community says. reddogsix (talk) 18:22, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 11:49, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Red Phoenix ^talk 01:28, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - GNG & NFILM not met. For the record, Wikipedia isn't a place to promote non-notable subjects, nor is it a place to earn money writing promotional articles. Exemplo347 (talk) 13:46, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.