Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/63lbs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as a copyright infringement of http://m.imdb.com/title/tt3305192/plotsummary and a number of other websites. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:50, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

63lbs[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No third-party references, only IMDB and Facebook. No evidence of film notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:37, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:06, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. And the article's creator made this too. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 18:33, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per nom. I also have a speedy deletion going for that, to. Our friend was also just blocked and his user page was deleted after I put a tag on it. Layla ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) 20:47, 2 February 2017 comment .......And the other one was just deleted by User:RickinBaltimore. Layla ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) 20:58, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above: no evidence of notability. Vanamonde (talk) 09:36, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.