Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/541st Medical Detachment, Forward Surgical (Airborne)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:50, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

541st Medical Detachment, Forward Surgical (Airborne)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does this organization meet the notability criteria as described at WP:MILUNIT? FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:47, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unless Hawkeye Pierce was one of the 20 personnel, this small unit hasn't done anything out of the ordinary to merit media attention. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:49, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep, subject is notable per criteria #3 of WP:MILUNIT. Additionally, although the subject has not received significant coverage in the news sources, but has received coverage in books such as ones published by the Army Office of Surgeon General, as in scholarly papers.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 03:24, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete in accordance with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/722nd Ordnance Company (United States), and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/575th Signal Company (United States). Separate, non-combat company level units and below are not considered notable. Buckshot06 (talk) 05:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Buckshot Nick-D (talk) 09:40, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, as this is a forward surgical team, would those who have !voted for deletion, would they be opposed to merge & redirect to the article about FSTs?--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:51, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:14, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:14, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 22:50, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 00:56, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:04, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Clarify - in response to RightCowLeftCoast's comment, no change in vote. Buckshot06 (talk) 17:43, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Ditto. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:22, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.