Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/52 Cancri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:30, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

52 Cancri

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Star stub with no notability and no references. Lithopsian (talk) 11:51, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 13:39, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. crh23 (talk) 14:28, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I couldn't think of anywhere better than to put the AfD into the "Science" category. Apologies if inappropriate. Nordic Dragon 13:41, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I found an astronomy catagory, not sure if it's active, but it looks to be.

Delete per WP:NASTCRIT. Not visible to the naked eye, not otherwise notable. Google only gives me wiki mirrors. crh23 (talk) 14:28, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I found no useful studies of this star. It fails WP:GNG. Praemonitus (talk) 19:06, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom and crh23. I performed a full-text search for "52 Cancri" in the scholarly literature using NASA's ADS search engine, but I didn't find any in-depth coverage fulfilling WP:NASTCRIT. Astro4686 (talk) 23:16, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as searches found nothing convincingly better. SwisterTwister talk 01:47, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.