Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/524 Studio
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 21:19, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- 524 Studio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not have the kind of coverage needed to establish notability according to WP:GNG or WP:ORG. The fact that Zhou Wenjun has won an award does not necessarily make him or his company notable. ubiquity (talk) 18:18, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:53, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:53, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete – Does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH, concluded after several source searches. Note that I also performed searches for the company's founder, Zhou Wenjun (designer), which did not provide significant coverage. That article is nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhou Wenjun (designer). North America1000 05:09, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Non notable and it seems that this article and the other one about the was written by the same person, possibly the founder himself. ThurstonHowell3rd (talk) 05:28, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.