Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/5% Ownership

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Form 10-K. Veinor ^{(talk to me)} 20:29, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

5% Ownership[edit]

It really doesn't offer much info beyond what can be deduced from teh title. Esprit15d (talk ¤ contribs) 20:15, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - Well, it's definitely "stubby." In the US, the SEC requires all owners of at least 5% of a publicly traded company to be named in the 10-K report. Should be put into the 10-K article. Probably not worth a redirect since I'm not sure who would look this up as 5% rule? Autocracy 20:36, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - this is a common shorthand way of referring to this rule in such things as stock prospectuses. New investors will definitely be looking this up atr one time or another. Nardman1 20:38, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect then, I think. It's only significant because of the SEC 10-K requirements. I'll be happy to do the legwork myself is somebody puts it on my talk page after we get consensus. Autocracy 20:43, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - to Form 10-K -- Whpq 22:07, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Form 10-K per Autocracy. I'm not sure whether it's really a plausible search term, but in any case a merge under GFDL requires redirecting and tagging with {{R from merge}}. Of course, if information is added to 10-K without reliance on this article, then no redirect would be necessary. -- Black Falcon 03:15, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.