Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/4th Disciple
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:42, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
4th Disciple[edit]
- 4th Disciple (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No references provided to support this claims, need references to prove this person is notable. Jeremy112233 (talk) 04:17, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Notable for his production work as well as for his membership of Killarmy. Sources exist. --Michig (talk) 08:34, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:38, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Keeper | 76 14:34, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I've relisted this. Saying "sources exist" and just plain old "Keep", are both entirely unhelpful to a deletion discussion. Please try harder. Keeper | 76 14:35, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.