Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/4 8 15 16 23 42
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 23:54, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Pointless fancruft, there's already a section about the numbers on the main Lost article. Jtrost 21:04, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, such garbage deserves it. Pavel Vozenilek 21:15, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to main Lost article --NaconKantari 21:37, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, This article has been previously deleted, [1]. --NaconKantari 22:14, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- In that case it would be best to redirect this article to the main Lost article to avoid another afd in the future. Jtrost 22:19, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect as above. (aeropagitica) 22:54, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect for the same reasons stated above. Mo0[talk] 23:08, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- A very weak redirect with content deletion, and only because this article's has already been resurrected once. It should not be merged, however. There's already a section about the numbers on the main article, expansion of which would decrease the quality of the article, since examples of these numbers within the series are numerous and the section has consistently been proven a cruft magnet, not to mention that they're probably only a MacGuffin anyway. Baryonyx 23:12, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and Redirect per aeropagitica, Incognito 00:05, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect as above. --TheMidnighters 00:21, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete/Redirect ditto the above—LeFlyman 00:23, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect as fancruft and original research. Rillian 00:43, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect. Fancruft. Plausible as a search keyword, so therefore useful as a redirect. android79 17:47, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.