Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/43 Express

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:19, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

43 Express

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG as it simply a listing of a single route's bus stops. The minimal news mentions all fail one or more of local, trivial, and passing mention. Ravendrop 05:34, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete as we don't do bus routes per long precedent. Mangoe (talk) 13:28, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:29, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Search for sources gives me nothing that suggests this meets WP:GNG. (But note that the rationale one above mine, "we don't do bus routes", is both an awful reason for deletion and not even accurate - several have survived AfDs and at least one is a GA.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.178.185.218 (talk) 00:28, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.