Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/37coins

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:43, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

37coins[edit]

37coins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Somewhat promotional article about an unremarkable, failed startup. Does not, and will never meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Created by a SPA who contested a PROD on the day this page was created (8 May 2014) without addressing the concerns raised. MER-C 11:40, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:17, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:17, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - there are small mentions in more reliable sources such as News24 or TechCrunch, but only SIGCOV are in the crypto industry mags that are amongst the most unreliable of industry mags. A lot of that coverage is purely the shutdown of the company, and obviously it isn't going to get any further coverage. Nosebagbear (talk) 22:48, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - a startup that lasted 1.5 years in an industry with 100s of companies. Is "Tech in Asia" a reliable source? The other 3 certainly aren't. Not notable. Smallbones(smalltalk) 21:49, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • and the article originator was a paid editor [1]. Hope he cashed his check quickly. Smallbones(smalltalk) 21:54, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.