Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/365daband

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Will draftify/userfy upon request. Jenks24 (talk) 13:24, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

365daband[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of any notability, largely WP:FANCRUFT and has an air of the promotional. Fails WP:MUSIC. Karst (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:08, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:08, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there's unlikely better improvement. Pinging likely interested users Michig and Walter Görlitz. SwisterTwister talk 05:41, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It seems that the band's English name is a translation or something. The Vietnamese name is different (based on the three references in the article). Since there doesn't appear to be an link to a corresponding article on the Vietnamese project, it may be difficult to source reliably. The English sources just aren't there to support the subject's notability. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:32, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment 365daband is part of contemporary V-Pop. The name of the band is the original one; no 'Vietnamese translation' as it was suggested (the articles deal with the different members of the band, hence 'ST 365', 'Isaac 365', etc. Like K-Pop, as you know, the members of a group can produce solo materials). They released several EPs in Asia, even though it's still hard to provide Wiki with official links iTunes ID and so on (I found one though). You can find other releases on different music websites like this: http://musictea.org/music/365daband or http://www.last.fm/music/365daband/+albums. I am currently working on their discography for a month and hope I could introduce it on Wikipedia. User:Benjiimix (fr.wikipedia.org) 14:05, 5 November 2015

That still doesn't add any notability, I'm afraid. It needs reliable third party sources. Referencing Youtube videos and iTunes is adding WP:PRIMARY. Is the band notable outside their own country? Have they featured in national media or charts? Please check WP:MUSIC for the criteria. Karst (talk) 13:19, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor ^Talk! 12:18, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Userfy - until notability and reference issues can be dealt with. As Walter Görlitz' assessment points out, it currently does not pass notability criteria. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.