Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3183
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy Delete. Creator's articles were mass deleted by Materialscientist. [[1]] (non-admin closure) JbhTalk 02:20, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
3183[edit]
- 3183 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Same reason as the 9987 deletion below. CatcherStorm talk 18:22, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete but really, this is one of the few cases a mass nomination would be totally justified. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 21:13, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete I also support mass deletion and blocking of the year spammer. Fbergo (talk) 23:55, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as per WP:NOTFUTURE, all the others as well. J947 00:44, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.