Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/315Work Avenue

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

315Work Avenue

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:NCOMPANY. Although the presented sources are reliable, coverage is nothing more than WP:ROUTINE. Hitro talk 07:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. Hitro talk 07:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I found this title notable as it has enough good references on trusted websites. I respect the editors' tag of advertisement, I'll improv it by removing information which looks like an advertisement . Lazzy Crazzy (talk) 06:23, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:43, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – too much ROUTINE news coverage, as the nominator stated. Articles starting with "(subject) leashes/takes/signs" feels more than routine coverage. No other GNG passable source so fails notability guidelines. Toadette ^{(Let's discuss together!)} 18:44, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Feels this page should stay, notable entity and news sources. Awards on this profile's name tooWikieditorhans1 (talk) 07:02, 7 March 2024 (UTC) — Wikieditorhans1 (talk · contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of Dwaipayangreenreef (talk · contribs). [reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:25, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE I've blocked a couple of participants in this AfD as part of a UPE group that have been pushing the same articles over the past four years and evading salting protections by creating the articles under different titles. This article title doesn't seem to fall under that evasion but the participant link (sock/meat) is established through the other articles. —SpacemanSpiff 03:07, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final Relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:36, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: promotional based on the references and the article itself. No significant coverage seen. HarukaAmaranth ^春 _香 08:31, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nominator. Does not satisfy WP:NCOMPANY. Jamiebuba (talk) 00:46, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is a company therefore references are required to meet GNG/WP:NCORP guidelines to establish topic notability. They don't, topic fails NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 10:53, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.