Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/30footfall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Johnleemk | Talk 12:26, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

30footfall

Band. 689 Google hits. Asserts notability, so not a speedy, but seems pretty shaky. ~~ N (t/c) 03:04, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

• Keep, but cleanup. Band seems notable. Sycthos^Talk 03:17, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep but cleanup: People vote to keep Rockets red glare and this band is more notable than them. Criteria for bands is way too loose here but they have a few CDs available on Amazon.com and get good reviews. They don't seem to have a web site though which is disconcerting where notability is concerned. Even my Aunt Esther has a website... —Wknight94 (talk) 21:21, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, enduring band with various releases, seem to be more notable than wknight's Aunt Esther despite lack of website. Kappa 23:11, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep I'm not quite ready to trust the Google test on this one, does anyone have any idea of the number of their albums 'in the wild?' Will 00:52, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Preaky 21:41, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, only 689 Google hits. Incognito 00:03, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep The band has an Allmusic page with biography and a discography citing 4 releases, so it meets WP:MUSIC. Please check Allmusic rather than google when nominating a band, it's pretty simple to do. --TheMidnighters 00:18, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.