Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/30 Days of Night: Dust to Dust

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:08, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

30 Days of Night: Dust to Dust[edit]

This miniseries which was only available via the internet or via On Demand programming has not received any attention in reliable sources that I can find, and I can find no evidence that it meets either the general notability criteria or the film notability criteria. Raven1977 (talk) 16:29, 3 January 2009 (UTC) Nomination withdrawn. Article meets web notability per everyone who commented below. Raven1977 (talk) 16:39, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 16:30, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 16:38, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:NF. Schuym1 (talk) 16:56, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Vote changed to keep: per everyone that voted keep. Schuym1 (talk) 23:54, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. As an Internet-targetted film, WP:WEB is probably the more appropriate guideline. Was picked up for distribution by Time Warner Cable-on-Demand, which appears to satisfy WP:WEB condition 3. Possible sources: [1] [2]. JulesH (talk) 17:27, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 17:43, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. StonerDude420 (talk) 18:21, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with respects to the nom. WP:WEB would seem to apply, and it does have seemed to have gotten enough coverage in reliable sources to tweak the general notability guidelines through a search of Google[3] and Google News[4][5]. I believe the article can be rescued and cleaned up and have so tagged it. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 20:46, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as meeting WP:WEB, or failing that, merge into 30 Days of Night per WP:NNC. No particular reason to delete it. Jclemens (talk) 06:56, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.