Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2 (Saint Lu album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Saint Lu. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:06, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2 (Saint Lu album)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable album Gaijin42 (talk) 16:18, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Given that the album was only issued a couple of weeks ago what other sources than radio interviews and reviews can anyone expect? In ictu oculi (talk) 08:52, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, one would not expect much else. One would also not expect a wikipedia article, as it fails WP:GNG and WP:ALBUM due to the lack of other coverage. Mere existence of the album is not sufficient for an article. Gaijin42 (talk) 15:21, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 22:04, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:35, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Saint Lu, should it receive more coverage it can easily be recreated. J04n(talk page) 22:40, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.