Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2798 Vergilius

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 2001–3000. Davewild (talk) 17:58, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2798 Vergilius

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG, but as a low-numbered asteroid, consensus is that it is well-discussed rather than redirected unilaterally. I think it should be deleted; or (preferably) redirected to List of minor planets: 2001–3000 per NASTRO's guidelines. Boleyn (talk) 08:44, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:10, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per WP:DWMP; insufficient sources found. Praemonitus (talk) 17:49, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak redirect. Apparently it's one of the larger objects in a 1:2 resonance with Mars [1]. But that paper doesn't have much other information about this object and I didn't find others. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:51, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Since it is in resonance with Mars. WP:NASTRO is merely a guideline and should not be used to remove borderline asteroids as the main-belt asteroid problem was created by bots and should not be over corrected. It would be better if borderline asteroids were actually dealt with by the Astro project instead of a generic AfD. -- Kheider (talk) 14:15, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 17:42, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:48, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.