Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/21st CW AAF Mod

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:12, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

21st CW AAF Mod

Not notable mod, fails WP:SOFTWARE. BJ^Talk 15:29, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

STRONG Keep per nom COME OF IT BJ. WP:SOFTWARE is not official policy [22ndCW]Dell970 18:30, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Comment, I never said it wasn't a real mod, I'm saying it is not notable. BJ^Talk 18:32, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment WP:SOFTWARE is not official policy- [22ndCW]Dell970 19:07, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Comment This is a speaicl mod used for the tournment!

Delete - WP:SOFTWARE might be a guideline, but it's still a good guideline, and this doesn't appear to have anything resembling reliable sources indicating its notability. Not to mention it reads like promo material as is; if it stays around, that should definitely be changed. Tony Fox (arf!) 21:34, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete who cares about WP:SOFTWARE, how about WP:RS or WP:NOTE. --Daniel J. Leivick 21:37, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no claim of notability, reads like a press release. No indication of verifiable independent coverage that isn't trivial. If there is reason (other than the company's own website and PR, and fan forums) to believe that the topic meets WP core policies, strongly enough to override the policy-based guidelines at WP:SOFTWARE, then you need to cite that reason. There are hundreds, or thousands, of computer game mods out there, and very few have been written about in featured magazine/newspaper articles or have had any big influence on their field. Barno 02:18, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The above item was added 19:47, 18 January, then was deleted by User:Dell970 at 18:54, 18 January, as part of a series of edits. Dell970 is warned that removing others' comments from AfD pages (except reverting the most disruptive of vandalism) is strongly frowned upon. Barno 02:18, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete non-notable, fails WP:RS, WP:SOFTWARE. Resolute 04:26, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: why dont you guys get a life. Stop fucking up peoples pages that they made and saying that it ant notable. How the hell doyou guys know??. it is notable. it has many articles written about it in magazines like PC gamer so dont give me this crap! [22ndCW, IC ArmA]Dell970 16:14, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Comment: HOW ABOUT

Aussie Gamer mag- issue 100.

PC game issue- 150

[22ndCW, IC ArmA]Dell970 16:14, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Comment I checked Google for Aussie Gamer and could find no magazines by that name, am I not searching properly? Do not make personal attacks on Wikipedia they will get you no where. --Daniel J. Leivick 17:13, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Do you have any verifiable, reliable sources that can be proven? There is no indication at all that this mod received non-trivial coverage in PC Gamer #150. You wouldnt happen to have a website link for Aussie Gamer, would you? Resolute 18:13, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aussie Gamer mag- issue 100 is a mag and you can onlyfind it on a .au site

Comment So, what is the URL for the magazine? The internet doesn't stop at the borders to ask if packets can go in and out. Just tell us the URL. --Habap 15:39, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It is a re-posting of a previously deleted article with no new sources: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/21st Century Warfare. --Habap 20:53, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you idiot. THE PAGE IS FOR THE 21st AAF NOT THE 21st CW! [22ndCW, IC ArmA]Dell970 00:45, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Delete unless reliable sources are shown. The current sources in the article do not appear to satisfy the WP:RS requirement. Fails WP:V and notability requirements. --Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 02:47, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.